By SUE KENNEDY
Formerly a county government reporter
for the Illinois Stale Register, she
writes a monthly education newspaper
for the Illinois Office of Education.
IN TEN YEARS, the nation's supply of natural gas will be almost gone, but there is a substitute and there is plenty of it in Illinois. The state's high sulfur coal can be converted, by an expensive and complex technology, into a substitute for the nation's dwindling supply of natural gas.
In Illinois, there are three coal gasification facilities scheduled which will make the state the national leader in the new industry. The New Athens (St. Clair County) and the Perry County plants will be constructed, and a third will be the existing Powerton Plant near Pekin which will be converted to the new industry. See the accompanying map for the 29 potential coal conversion sites in Illinois. Such an industry would require an extractable coal reserve of 150 million tons per site, which is the amount needed to supply a gasification plant over its 20-year lifetime. Each of these plants would require a mine complex producing about six million tons of coal per year, and each plant would produce 250 million cubic feet of substitute natural gas each day. A 1974 study by the Illinois Institute for Environmental Quality (IIEQ) identified five sites for commercial-size plants, besides the St. Clair County site — two in Fayette County, one in Franklin County, one in Washington County, and one on the Macoupin-Madison county line.
Vast coal reserves
Illinois is second only to Montana in
measured coal reserves. Most of it is a
highly sulfurous, bituminous variety
which cannot be burned without
measures to reduce sulfur dioxide
emission into the atmosphere. Sixty-five
per cent of the state (86 counties)
contains coal deposits totaling
approximately 161 billion tons. About
14 per cent of these reserves is found in seams lying less than 150 feet deep,
according to a 1974 Illinois State
Geological Survey report. But Illinois
must provide more than its coal if it
wishes to establish a sizable coal gasification industry in the state. A sizable
chunk of Illinois land and water resources, some of them irreplaceable,
must also be committed if industry is to
be attracted to the state.
The conversion process
The conversion process itself is
relatively simple, although there are as
many variations as there are companies
involved. Basically, coal is heated in the
presence of steam which causes some of
the hydrogen in the steam to unite with
the carbon in coal. This forms methane
(CH4), the principal ingredient of
natural gas. Besides producing
methane, the process also generates
carbon monoxide and hydrogen. These
two gases can be made to react to form
more methane in a step called methanation. During the gasification process, some
of the carbon is burned in the presence
of air (O2) to produce the heat that
makes the process work. This burning
yields carbon dioxide as a waste product
as well as ash and sulfur which can be
sold or stored. To get a high quality gas
the oxygen content in the gasifier is
increased, yielding a higher percentage
of methane. In liquefaction, coal is
heated to produce gas which then reacts
Balking at the cost of installing stack
gas scrubbers to eliminate sulfur dioxide
after burning, industry nationwide is
turning to coal conversion. "You name a
major oil company, and they've got a big
budget going for coal gasification, and
each thinks they've got the best
process," said Jack Howard, manager of
coal development in the Illinois
Department of Business and Economic
Development (BED).
16 / November 1976 / Illinois Issues
under pressure with hydrogen to produce a liquid plus leftover char. Industry's desire to scale this process to modern needs has spawned a profusion of pilot and demonstration plants all over the country in the past few years.
Illinois' first major coal conversion plant will combine the technologies of gasification and liquefaction to produce a high quality synthetic natural gas (SNG) that can be burned in homes and a low sulfur fuel for industrial use and liquid products. It will be located on 2,000 acres between New Athens and Fayetteville in the Kaskaskia River Valley in southeastern St. Clair County, approximately 30 miles southeast of St. Louis. BED'S site proposal for the Coalcon project listed assets of the area including the existence of 1.6 billion tons of mapped coal reserves within the six township area surrounding the site — an amount which could provide "seven times the estimated 110 million tons required by the commercial plant over a 20-year period."
New Athens demonstration plant
Initially, the plant will be a demonstration model and will be purchased by
Coalcon at the end of three years of
testing. The federal Energy Research
and Development Administration
(ERDA) awarded the contract to Coalcon, a partnership since 1974 between
Union Carbide Corporation and Chemical Construction Corporation (a unit of
General Tire's Aerojet-General
Corporation), and announced the site
selection last November after examining
17 other sites in five states (Ohio,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky
and Indiana). The demonstration plant
is to be based on a pilot plant run by
Union Carbide in Lake DeSmet, Wyo.,
over the past 10 years. It will be one-fifth
the size of the commercial plant and
have a design life of 20 years.
A high pressure hydrocarbonization
process will be used to convert 3,850
tons of coal a day to 4,142 barrels of
liquid and 20.2 million cubic feet of gas
products in the demonstration phase.
"Coalcon is taking advantage of coal's
natural tendency to change to both a gas
and a liquid in the conversion process,"
Howard explained. "It's harder to drive
the substance completely to either a
liquid or a gas." The greatest potential
from coal conversion in Illinois is a coal
chemicals industry, Howard said,
reflecting Coalcon's focus on the liquefaction process. "Many products
which were made from crude oil when it
was cheap can be made from coal." Fuel
oil and chemicals such as ammonia and
naphthalene will be produced at the
New Athens plant.
The sulfur produced in the process will be sold to make sulfuric acid, if possible. If it cannot be sold, the material will be given away or stored until it can be marketed. The ash yield, to be buried on the site, will be about 10 per cent of the total coal processed daily, or about 385 tons if 3,850 tons of coal are used. Besides coal supplies, other resources are needed to operate a gasification plant, and Coalcon executives believe those resources are available at the New Athens site. Nearly 2 million gallons of water, 80 per cent of which is totally consumed in the process, will be withdrawn daily from the nearby Kaskaskia River in the first phase. About 21 million gallons of water will be withdrawn for the com- mercial plant. Should supplies run low, a prospect designers say is unlikely, plans are being made to pumpadditional water from the Mississippi River. |
![]() |
Specific state incentives proposed for the New Athens
plant include water at no charge during the life
of the demonstration project, cheap
river frontage., extension of roads at no cost
and a 5-10 year property tax break on leased lands
Electricity to run the plant will be supplied by the nearby Baldwin power
plant. Transportation in the area includes the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, U.S. Route 460, Illinois Route 13,
and various natural gas and refined
products pipelines passing close by the
site. Also, barge service with the ability
to transport up to 20 million tons of coal
per year will be available on the
Kaskaskia River following completion
of the navigation channel in 1978.
Finally, the metropolitan St. Louis area
will provide the sizable construction,
maintenance and operation crew. The only real concerns with the site
involve possible environmental
problems in the future, according to
proposal writers. "A well controlled
coal conversion demonstration facility
would not contribute sufficient particles
and sulfur dioxide (to the atmosphere)
to exceed the allowable increments.
However, a commercial plant may
create some problems because of its
size." An environmental impact
statement on the project remains to be
done, although Coalcon completed an
environmental assessment as part of
selection criteria imposed by ERDA.
The design phase is expected to take 18
months and cost $17 million.
Construction is planned to start in 1977
with plant operation in 1980. The commercial plant is expected to be in operation by 1985.
Perry County and Powerton sites
A $20 million engineering and
development phase will begin
immediately in Perry County. The
Illinois Coa1 Gasification Group
(ICGG), a consortium among Northern
Illinois Gas Company, Aurora; People's
Gas Light & Coke Company, Chicago; Central Illinois Public Service
Company, Springfield; Central Illinois
Light Company, Peoria, and North
Shore Gas Company, Waukegan, was
selected by ERDA (Energy Research
and Development Administration) this
summer to build the facility.
Construction on the demonstration
plant will begin in 1978 if Congress
approves the funding. Commercial
plant construction will begin around
1985. Both the New Athens and the Perry
County sites are nearly perfect locations
for a coal conversion facility according
to BED Manager of Program
Development Rusty Glen. Land
(previously stripped and reclaimed),
water and coal are all readily available.
The companies which will provide much
of the coal for plant operation also own
all the land needed for the facilities.
"This makes it much easier than having
to deal with several landowners," Glen
says. About 65 per cent of the coal to be
used in each facility will be taken from
nearby mines. The rest will come from
various parts of the United States and
Europe, to test different grades. Lastly, ERDA gave the go-ahead this
summer for an on-site coal conversion
facility at Commonwealth Edison's
Powerton Plant near Pekin. The facility
will produce boiler fuel for use in the
electric generating plant. Although industry has done its part to
bring coal conversion to Illinois, government has also aided the project
ERDA is financing the New Athens
plant to the tune of approximately $110
million while Coalcon is sinking around
$100 million into it, and the state of
Illinois will contribute S25 million from
coal development bonds.
The Perry County coal conversion
facility, which will also employ
liquefaction and gasification
technologies, will be located
approximately 11 miles southwest of
Pinckneyville. In its demonstration
phase it will produce 22 million cubic
feet of pipeline quality gas and 2,000
barrels of crude oil per day from 2,300 tons of coal. Water will be piped from
the Mississippi River, along a
previously obtained, 17-mile right-of-way.
ERDA will finance approximately 50
per cent of the $276 million Perry
County project and the $105 million
Powerton facility. The State of Illinois
will contribute $7.2 million to the
Powerton facility, and Commonwealth
Edison will pick up the balance. ICGG
presently plans to spend around $130
million on the Perry County plant.
Illinois' share has not yet been
determined, but could be around 10 per
cent of the iota! project cost.
The Coal Development Bond Act
|
![]() |
advise the BED. Principal sponsor of the legislation was Sen. Bradley M. Glass (R., Northbrook).
At the same time, former Rep. Robert W. Blair (R., Park Forest), steered legislation through the General Assembly to create the Illinois Energy Resources Commission, composed of legislators and private citizens. In addition to recommending strategies for solving energy related problems in Illinois, the commission authorizes the issuance and sale of bonds for coal development projects it deems worthy.
The state commitment to coal development is firmly established. However, in the 1975 legislative session, the idea was expressed that perhaps the powers of eminent domain extended to the BED in the Illinois Coal Development Act were a bit too broad. Since the law had been enacted to give industry the incentive to develop coal resources, many thought it was not proper to give a state agency the power to condemn private land for private use. P. A. 79-713, sponsored by Rep. John S. Matijevich (D., North Chicago), amends the Coal Development Bond Act stating that the BED'S power of condemnation be exercised "solely for the purposes of siting and; or rights of way and or easements appurtenant to coal utilization and / or coal conversion projects". Another bill. H.B. 1704, sponsored by Rep. Adeline Jay Geo-Karis (R,. Zion), was passed to amend the Illinois Coal Development Bond Act to provide for the development of other energy sources, but it was vetoed by Gov. Dan Walker.
Specific governmental incentives
In addition, to help make Illinois' high sulfur coal a bit more "usable" while coal conversion techniques are refined, Rep, Richard 0. Hart's (D., Benton) legislation (P.A. 79-1099) directs the Illinois Pollution Control Board to set regulations for "internment control systems." The measure allows industries in low pollution areas to burn high sulfur coal as long as sulfur dioxide emissions do not exceed the minimums set by law. An intermittent control system entails selling up sensors around a plain to monitor emissions. |
![]() |
Specific governmental (state and local) incentives included in the BED'S site proposal for the New Athens project offered industry;
- water at no charge during the life of the demonstration project by virtue of state-owned land adjacent to the Kaskaskia River.
- lease frontage on the river for water intakes and discharge flumes from the state at an annual cost of S!0 per foot of river frontage and S75 an acre of backland;
- extension of county roads to state highways at no cost;
- a tentative 5-to-10-year property tax moratorium for lands leased by the state (The county government also indicated there is wide discretion on valuation of the leasehold.);
- the use of BED'S powers of eminent
domain.The proposal also noted BED s efforts to establish a U.S. Bureau of Mines research station at Carbondale, one of five in the country, for the study of coal mining and reclamation problems A Coal Extraction and Utilization Resource Center also exists at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale for this purpose. Also. the proposal states that three southern Illinois colleges have programs to "train, retrain or upgrade workers for Illinois mines. .
The impact of such an industry in several areas of Illinois would drastically affect not only the geography of the state, but its inhabitants as well. Water rights and loss of agricultural land are just two of the issues that will face Illinois citizens in counties where future plants are being considered. At least one community action group concerned about the growth of the coal conversion industry in the state. According to members to the Illinois South Project, based in Carterville, the question that Illinois citizens need to ask regarding this new industry is: "Who will benefit from coal and energy development projects, and who will pay the long-term costs?" Project member Dave Ostendorf acknowledges that the coal gasification industry may bring certain benefits to the state and nation, but only if its growth is managed so as to have the least possible adverse effect on the environmental and economic bases of the states involved.
Tax costs
Ostendorf also points out that a
commercial size coal conversion plant
would require between 10,000 and
20 000 gallons of water per minute to operate. Between 14.4 and 28.8 million gallons per day would be entirely
consumed in the process. The Illinois Water Survey has already identified 240 potential sites for gasification related
reservoirs, according to Ostendorf. "Even if the water base were there," he said, "Illinois does not have a water permit statute that would control the rate and amount of water withdrawn from a natural watercourse or from groundwater or diffused water sources." Ostendorf said that the Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission (a legislative study commission) made clear in Water Resources Management in Illinois: A Program Review (1974) that Illinois water rights law is largely an archaic and jumbled system of case law rather than
For starters, Ostendorf says citizens
should be aware of the tax impact of any
new plants on the community. For
example, the 5-to-10-year tentative
property tax moratorium originally
offered by St. Clair County for lands
leased by the state to Coalcon could put
a heavy burden on New Athens taxpayers, he says. Community residents
would have to bear costs for an array of
municipal services for the large number
of newcomers the plant is expected to
bring. "It is imperative," Ostendorf said, "that any preferential treatment extended to industry does not result in an
additional tax burden on residents of the community."
November 1976 / Illinois Issues / 19
statutes, and that the system is heavily based on riparian rights which allow an owner of land adjoining a naturally flowing stream to use water at his own discretion. The report states that "it is still private ownership of riparian land which generates the recognized right to use water, and not consideration of social and economic impact."
Water supply
One piece of legislation in this vein,
H.B. 1786, was introduced by Rep.
Thaddeus S. Lechowicz (D., Chicago)
during the past legislative session as a
result of the commission's study to
establish a system of registration and
permits for large uses of water. The
measure, which was sent to the Study
Calendar on Counties and Townships
— where it stayed — would have created
the Illinois Water Resources Authority.
Similar legislation is being drawn up in the Illinois Division of Waterways.
"Coal gasification has long been a
concern to us," commented Bruce
Barker of the division. "It's kind of a
double-edged sword with regard to
water supply. We need the water for
energy production, but one coal gasification plant would use water like the
whole city of Rockford or Peoria." In addition to allocating water based
on supply, he says a permit type statute
applied on an area-by-area basis would
help the state to direct large-scale users
to regions of adequate supply. And, by
rationing the naturally available stream
flow, he believes industry will continue
to augment Illinois' water supply with
reservoirs. "We're really trying to
prevent any cutthroat competition with
this permit system. We want people to
realize the effect their water usage has
on their neighbors." The division's
legislation would differ from H.B. 1786
primarily in that existing agencies
would administer the program. Glen of the BED predicts that such
legislation will be law in three to five
years. "There is need for a system of
permits for water usage. Communities
need to be able to plan for their water
needs. This will institute a kind of 100-year growth limit to assure a reassessment of needs."
In regard to water supply, the commission's report stated, "There is still
enough water in the state to meet
current overall demand projections. A
number of things could happen, however, which would change the situation
dramatically. Two of the most important would be a substantial drought and
the widespread use of coal gasification."
The report adds that within 50 years,
regardless of either impact, water supply
problems can be expected in La Salle-Peru, Springfield, Carbondale, East
Moline and Cook County. Ostendorf
added, "The issue, it seems, is relatively
simple: unless Illinois enacts a water
permit statute or clearly delineates legal
definitions of how much water can be
withdrawn from a natural source, by
whom and for what purpose, this water-consumptive coal gasification industry
could play havoc with Illinois' water
supply. Citizens must be assured, at the
very least, that their municipal water
supplies will not be interrupted."
Agricultural land
One nonprofit energy research organization, the Environmental Policy
Institute (EPI), based in Washington,
D.C, claims that Illinois strip mine laws
both directly and indirectly encourage
the loss of farmland, and that 5,000 to
6,000 acres of farmland are lost to strip
mining in Illinois annually. In a recent
report, "Strip Mining in the Corn Belt,"
the EPI says the Illinois Mined Land
Conservation and Reclamation Act and
Rule 1104 encourages this loss due to
the absence of any provision for determining pre-mining agricultural productivity or yield. "There are serious
questions as to whether high capability
agricultural lands strip mined for coal
can be returned to their original capabilities within an acceptable period of
time." It can take 10 to 30 years to
restructure agricultural soil after strip
mining, researchers say. The loss of farmland can be lessened
through the use of deep mining, however, the report states. "There is more
deep-minable coal in four Illinois
counties — Jefferson, Macoupin,
Montgomery and Sangamon (22.3
billion tons) — than there is strippable
coal in the entire state (19.5 billion tons).
In fact, there is more deep-minable coal
in Illinois than there is strippable coal in
the entire nation." In regard to Illinois'
importance as an agricultural state, the
report adds, "As of 1975, Illinois accounted for 15 per cent of the nation's
export shares for feed grains and feed
products, ranking second in the nation,
and 16 per cent of the nation's export
shares of soybeans and soybean products, ranking first in the nation." Illinois
South Project members and others
concerned about the growth of the coal
conversion industry believe Illinois
citizens have not had a great deal of
influence to date on governmental
decisions which are accelerating what is
termed "the new coal boom." Ostendorf concludes, "If citizens are to have
any voice concerning the siting and
development of new plants, they must
work quickly to recapture their role in governmental decision-making processes."
20 / November 1976 / Illinois Issues
Illinois South Project members believe that the impact of a widespread
gasification industry on agricultural
land in the state should also be assessed.
They point out that Illinois, the nation's
leading agricultural exporter, is losing
farmland at the rate of about 100,000
acres per year, according to an Illinois
Department of Agriculture estimate.
"New coal mines — both deep mines
and strip mines — along with a coal
gasification industry, including the
possible construction of new reservoirs, pose a quiet, but potentially severe
threat to agricultural lands," Ostendorf
said. "One high energy plant would
require disposal of about 5,000 tons of
solid wastes each day. If used as land fill,
this would require 1,250 acres of land
covered to a depth of 10 feet over the 20
year life of the plant."