By WILLIAM A. SYERS
A 1977 legislative intern, Syers was serving with the House Human Resources committee when this article was written. BEFORE he was beaten to death by them Johnny Lindquist, a six-year-old Illinois boy, described his parents in this way: "You are not fit to be called human beings. Animals take better care of their young." Normally this would be a shocking statement from a six-year-old. It is not shocking at all coming from a young boy who died before his seventh birthday in a coma with his skull fractured and his frail body covered with large red welts. Born on August 28, 1965, Johnny Lindquist immediately joined an older sister at St. Francis orphanage. His mother was tubercular. He lived in several foster homes during his short life. His last foster parents, Robert and Francis Karvenek, moved him to a farm in Wisconsin where he flourished in the wholesome environment. He loved his foster parents and the pony they gave him. He lived with the Karveneks for three-and-one-half years. In 1970 his natural parents began legal proceedings to regain custody. Johnny prayed every night that he would not have to return. On a previous visit there was evidence that he had been mentally and physically abused by his father. During the time he lived with the Karveneks, they never received any letters from the Lindquists. |
![]() |
The Lindquists had five children. Mr.
Lindquist had been unemployed since
1967. A social worker apparently
advised the Lindquists that their monthly welfare check would be larger if they
regained custody of the child. On
February 25, 1972, Johnny Lindquist
was returned to his natural parents.
There is no official record of a court
order for that action. Judge Thomas
Rosenburg was quoted in the Chicago
newspapers as saying that the Illinois
Apartment of Children and Family
Services took it upon themselves to
return the child to his natural parents.
After the case hit the papers, an assistant
state's attorney lamented, "We have a
Johnny Lindquist every month, but
nobody hears about it."
The Lindquist case spurred new
legislation in the area of child abuse in
Illinois. This article investigates the
progress those laws have made in dealing with the growing problem of
child neglect. Twelve years have passed since Illinois first enacted a law requiring
reporting of child abuse, and a great
deal of information has been collected.
But those who have analyzed the
statistics may question whether the
Illinois Department of Children and
Family Services (DCFS), the courts,
and local welfare agencies have yet to
come to grips with the problem. The
facts highlight these shockers: • Mothers are the leading child
abusers. The majority of abusive parents are repeaters and are known to
social service agencies. • More than two-thirds of all child
abuse and neglect cases occur in one-parent homes. A higher than average
number of abused children are illegitimate. • Child abuse occurs at every level of
society. And most of the abusers are, by
ordinary standards, responsible persons
— only 10 per cent of the parents who
abuse their children have serious mental
illness or deficiencies. A profile based on the actors most
commonly found in child abuse cases is
as follows: The typical child abuser is a young mother. She is probably under 24
years of age, and her child is either
illegitimate or premature. It is likely that
she has more than one child, is alone in
raising and supporting the child and
lacks money to make ends meet. She is
most likely to be white, and there is a
better than average chance she lives in
Cook County. The mother often has a
recognized potential for abuse and has
dealt more than once with an agency in
the field. Perhaps the most alarming statement
comes from Vice President Walter F.
Mondale. Writing in Trial magazine
(May-June 1974), the then senator from
Minnesota said that if estimates by
experts are truly indicative of the
problem, child abuse could turn out to
be a more frequent cause of deaths
among children than such diseases as
muscular dystrophy, leukemia, cystic
fibrosis or even automobile fatalities.
August 1977 / Illinois Issues / 7
1965 was succeeded in 1975 by a new law. This statute, the Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act (Illinois Revised Statutes, 1975, Chapter 23, sections 2051-2061), defines abuse and neglect and lists those who are required to report abuse and neglect of children. In addition, the new act authorizes permissive reporting by any other person presumed to be acting in good faith. (The problem before with ordinary citizens reporting abuse and neglect was they had no immunity from suit if they could not prove their allegations in court.) Chief sponsor of the new law was Sen. Philip J. Rock (D., Chicago).
The new law allows physicians to retain temporary protective custody of children they believe might be in imminent danger if returned home. The physician notifies the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) so that the agency can go to the Juvenile Court to retain temporary custody of the child. Physicians are also authorized to take color photos or x-rays of an injured child — to preserve evidence of the injuries — at state expense. The act retains provisions for a confidential central registry of reports of child abuse and neglect. The 1975 legislation also amended the Juvenile Court Act to strengthen the provisions regarding the appointment of a guardian ad litem (a special, court-appointed guardian) for minors. It mandated that the courts appoint a guardian ad litem when the minor before the courts was involved in a child abuse or neglect petition. The role of the guardian is to look out for the child's interests in cases where these run counter to those of parents charged with abuse or neglect.
The role of the private citizen in protecting children from abuse becomes apparent when the sources of child abuse reports are analyzed. In fiscal year 1976, almost 37 per cent of child abuse reports came from private citizens and miscellaneous sources. About21 per cent were reported by hospital personnel other than physicians. Law enforcement agencies were responsible for approximately 21 per cent of the reports and schools for 11 per cent. Interestingly, physicians in hospitals account for only about 4 per cent of child abuse reports, and private physicians, sending in a little over 1 per cent of the reports, are only slightly better sources than day care centers and babysitters. Public aid agencies are lowest on the list. |
|
Child beating accounted for more than a third of the cases reported in 1976 (2,566 cases or 38 per cent of the total). This was followed by neglect, 2,436 cases. Other types of abuse were: injuries of more than one type, 472; sexual abuse, 352; burns, 183; malnutrition, 147; fractures, 120; poisoning, 3; not reported, 4; and all other, 465. In addition, there were 52 deaths with 43 dead on arrival at the hospital and 9 expiring later.
Two-fifths of the 1976 cases involved children from 3 through 9 years of age. About a fourth of the children were under 3, and about 35 per cent were 10 or older. Those suspected of abuse or neglect were mothers in 48.9 percent of the cases, fathers in 16.0 per cent, both mothers and fathers in 9.9 percent. Others included stepparents, foster parents, mother's boyfriend, brothers or sisters, other relatives, babysitters and neighbors.
If child abuse is a significant problem then the way to solve it, according to those who have studied the problem is to deal with it where it originates: with the parents. Placing children in temporary protective custody or foster care does not solve the problem. Studies in Denver indicate that nine-tenths of all child abuse can be dealt with effectively in the home, with therapy for the parents or with a nine-month trial separation. During the separation, abusive parents earn their children's return by actively receiving assistance and extensive therapy. The DCFS is authorized by law to provide social services to families of abused children, but department workers complain they can only work with the parents when the parents are willing to cooperate. Parents, they contend, fail to show up for appointments or to answer phone calls. The courts can, of course, force parents into therapy as part of their penalty. The difficulty that has arisen is the result of a common assumption of expertise on the |
|
8 / August 1977 / Illinois Issues
part of the courts. The courts need help
specifically from the agencies, which are
involved in each individual case. DCFS
is one such agency. In December 1976,
Illinois Juvenile Court Judge William S.
White was forced to order DCFS to
submit annual and biennial progress
reports on children under its
jurisdiction. Judge White cited over
15000 violations of the reporting
requirements by DCFS. Such progress
reports, if submitted accurately and in a
timely fashion, could prevent tragedies
such as the Lindquist case.
A new approach?
|
Task Force reports on abuse of retarded children
REPORTS of child abuse in state-supported childcare facilities prompted
the governor last May 19 to appoint a
special task force to study the problem.
The 18-member panel was formed after
allegations of staff cruelty and negligence
toward mentally retarded children living
at Windgate House in Woodstock. Windgate had received a great deal of
publicity after newspaper reports of
alleged abuses that included putting
tabasco sauce on the tongues of mentally retarded children as a form of punishment, as well as giving cold showers or denying meals, and, in some cases,
striking children on the hands and face. The Illinois Department of Children
and Family Services (DCFS) notified
Windgate on May 13 of its intent to
revoke the facility's license. The department listed a bill of particulars on abuses ranging from tying children to toilets to allowing one to drown and seven others
to become injured due to negligence. The task force said in its interim report
of June 15 that such abuses as were
alleged at Windgate came about because
of "a crazy quilt" system of health care
agencies with overlapping responsibilities "which has historically failed to
protect the very children who need the
most protection." The report went on to
say "that state activities. .. may have
actually contributed to encouraging
conditions in which abuse could occur." Cleo Anderson, a member of the task
force, and an inter-agency liaison and coordinator with DCFS, admits that
"there may be a case for closer coordination between agencies" in monitoring care of the mentally retarded. Anderson says DCFS was monitoring Windgate at
the time of the alleged abuses, but "we
couldn't do it around the clock. There
aren't enough monitors for that."
The task force's interim report said
that no state agency had been "derelict in
discharging its mandated charge." The
report said, "The problem seems to be a
system which lacks the specificity of
assignment and the correct standards
against which to measure the quality of
service to hold anyone accountable."
Such standards and specific divisions of responsibilities were to be outlined by
the task force in its final report to the
governor August 1. According to Ray
Unterbrink of the Association for Retarded Citizens, the findings will "probably require mostly executive action." Unterbrink believes that while active,
physical "abuse by commission" as was
alleged at Windgate gets the headlines,
"passive abuse" is an equally prevalent
problem in dealing with the retarded.
Such abuse, which entails not helping a
child develop to the fullest, may also be
addressed in the final report. In the meantime, investigations by four
state agencies of the Windgate home have
proceeded, and the hearings and court
battles over license revocation there may
continue for quite some time. (See
Names, p. 29 for members of task force.)
|
August 1977 / Illinois Issues / 9