![]() |
Home | Search | Browse | About IPO | Staff | Links |
BY CAROLINE GHERARDINI
Budget put together, once all side deals settled
Income tax rate now permanent at 3 percent
The state's spending plan for the year starting July 1 (13 days prior to its approval by the legislature) contains something for everyone, but more significant are changes approved for the revenue plan. For the record, the fiscal year 1994 budget stands at $30 billion, with the general revenue funds portion approved for $14.3 billion. That $14.3 billion represents the state spending — and its revenue — for basic day-to-day operations. On the revenue side, the income tax is now permanently raised to rates of 3 percent for individuals and 4.8 percent for corporations. Taxpayers will pay the same rate as before, when the basic rate plus a temporary surcharge added up to the 3 percent for individuals and 4.8 percent for corporations. But local governments wind up with a greater share of income tax revenue. Few observers doubted the temporary income tax surcharge rates would be allowed to expire June 30. But many were surprised that cities and counties won a permanent and bigger share of income taxes. For this budget year, the revenue that could be figured as part of the "old" surcharge was divvied up so the state got some and so did local governments. But in fiscal 1995, cities and counties will get 11 percent of state income taxes with their percentage to go up to a final 10 percent starting in fiscal 1996. The state will wind up with only 90 percent of income tax revenue by fiscal 1996. Before any surcharge or temporary rates had been added to the state income tax, cities and counties got 12 percent of the revenue. Distribution to cities and counties is still based on population.
Other pieces of the budget deals:
As Gov. Jim Edgar and the legislative leaders with a special team of "budgeteers" worked to hammer out the final deals in the final days of the legislative session, they dealt with the budget as an omnibus bill since almost all spending was tied up in one House-and-Senate conference
48/August & September 1993/Illinois Issues committee. Once all the side deals were done, the appropriations sailed through the legislature's roll calls and none was vetoed by the governor. Those side deals assured that each political entity got something. Examples include the OK on home-rule tax powers for the city of Chicago and some upfront money for its schools; authorization for toll road extensions in the suburban counties around Chicago; and the new 10 percent of state income tax for local governments. In the end, the spending plan is very similar to the budget proposed in March by the governor. Among the priorities he got is greater spending for two beleaguered agencies: the departments of Children and Family Services and Mental Health and Developmentally Disabled. Edgar also wound up agreeing to a new $60 million super-maximum security prison. Compromise also came on a $10 monthly increase in welfare grants to families of two or three, beginning in April. Education gained some, but only incremental increases — $142 million for elementary and secondary education and $52 million for higher education. (See table at right for spending details.) Two signs that the new budget may be an improvement in attempting to "balance" its revenue and spending are the plans to spend less of fiscal 1994's first three months of revenue for expenses from fiscal 1993 (the so-called lapse-period spending) and to pay off a significant portion of unpaid bills owed vendors. Left unresolved — and undebated in the spring session — was any restructuring of the balance between state aid and local property taxes for financing public schools. Although the budget was passed late, it was passed without any crisis: no late paychecks, no shutdown of government, no big surge in spending. Watch now as debate heats up on a heavy realignment of finances between state and locals since suburban Republican, Senate President James "Pate" Philip, in mid-August tossed onto the table the concept of switching school funding from the local property tax to a new and higher state income tax. *
August & September 1993/Illinois Issues/49 |
|