![]() |
Home | Search | Browse | About IPO | Staff | Links |
Politics
When Gov. Jim Edgar makes the long-expected announcement that he will seek a second term, the field will be set for the 1994 gubernatorial race. Edgar, of course, has a lock on the Republican nomination, while his Democratic challenger will emerge from a three-way primary battle among Atty. Gen. Roland W. Burris, Comptroller Dawn Clark Netsch and Cook County Board President Richard J. Phelan. None of the candidates is a newcomer to public life; all four have records that in the coming months will be fair game for their rivals and that, one would hope, will be scrutinized by the media to help voters assess their performances. More important than what the candidates have done in the past, however, is where they would take the state in the future — the vision each has of Illinois and the approaches each would take to the critical problems facing the state. Granted, in an era when media consultants, marketing strategists and opinion pollsters work to package and sell candidates like cornflakes or laundry detergent, a suggestion that Campaign 94 focus on real issues might seem overly idealistic or hopelessly naive. Nevertheless, the underlying premise — that candidates owe voters a frank discussion of key policy choices — is valid. To help those who would govern Illinois meet that responsibility, the following topics are offered as ones that deserve to be on the campaign agenda.
• Revenue reform. Illinois is heading into the 21st century with a revenue structure firmly rooted in the 19th. Local governments, especially schools, rely too heavily on the real estate tax, while the state limits its sales tax to tangible personal property even as the provision of services grows in economic significance. Moreover, the sales tax base has been eroded over the last two decades by a plethora of exemptions, most notably for food and medicine. In recent years, various proposals have surfaced to revamp the state's revenue structure, for example, by shifting the burden of funding schools and other local units to the income tax from the property tax, or by imposing the sales tax on services like haircuts, engine tuneups and marriage counseling. Airing such matters during the campaign would increase public awareness, perhaps even helping to build some consensus about what if anything should be done. If the candidates dismiss the subject, however, the winner is likely to find it much more difficult to make any change. 6/November 1993/Illinois Issues
employment to others designed to upgrade specific skills for a particular company's workers. Still, the mismatch between a workforce that is not well prepared and job openings that demand the very skills in short supply is a cause of considerable concern for the employer community. While economic development is sure to be a campaign buzzword, a candidate who's not ready to tackle workforce preparation is merely droning on about job creation. No doubt, other topics could be added to the foregoing list; by no means is it meant to be all-inclusive. The point, though, is that candidates ought to be discussing meat-and-potato issues, not some campaign handler's whipped-Jello talking points. *
November 1993/Illinois Issues/7 |
|