Home | Search | Browse | About IPO | Staff | Links |
Last-minute Agendas I have been asked on a number of occasions whether additions should be made to the board meeting agenda right before the meeting starts. I firmly believe that should never happen unless adding the agenda item is supported unanimously by the board or at least voted on by three-fifths of the board. Last-minute additions to board agendas could address an emergency issue but usually they spell trouble. It can be a way for a board member to use politics to get an issue on the agenda and, thus, it does not give anyone else but that board member a chance to prepare their thoughts on the subject. Some board members use this strategy to get pet projects or issues passed by the board.
I believe the board agenda should be established by the board chair or board president and the executive director. If an individual wants a subject put on the agenda, they should call the executive director or the president (presiding officer) at least one week prior to the board meeting. This keeps a member from dragging his or her fellow board members into a public discussion on controversial issues without preparation. There should be plenty of time set aside to research a subject prior to discussion at the board meeting. Exceptions do exist, however. Some boards allow an item to be placed on the agenda with time restrictions for discussions about the item, but they also clearly point out that no action can be taken on an item unless it is deemed an emergency at that particular board meeting. This gives board members a chance to express their concerns about a subject and then place it on the agenda of a special meeting if the issue is hot, or simply on the agenda for the next meeting. I also strongly recommend that the mission statement be printed at the top of every meeting agenda. This keeps the board focused on the meeting and the mission of the agency. If things do not pertain to the mission of the agency, they shouldn't be on the agenda and waste the boards time. The Chain of Command I recently read that an administrator sent a letter to his staff from the president of the board because he was concerned about a job he recently took and he was being undermined by a staff 6 Illinois Parks and Recreation
person who had been there for quite a long time. When staff are complaining about another staff person or the executive director and catching the ear of a board member, this is not the proper channel to follow. This kind of "back-door communication" definitely breaks down the chain of command. To prevent this situation, when a new staff member is hired or an executive director comes in, the letter in the box on page 6 can be tremendously helpful in the orientation of new board members as well as new staff.
September/October 2002 7 |
|