![]() |
Home | Search | Browse | About IPO | Staff | Links |
Legislative Action Issues revisited: AIDS, tax refunds, etc. By MICHAEL D. KLEMENS When lawmakers pass a bill or a package of bills, the issue seldom ends. Questions are revisited, refinements continue and tinkering goes on. Some changes are minor. Some seemingly minor changes are major. The big topic in the General Assembly in 1987 was AIDS. Lawmakers passed a collection of bills that Gov. James R. Thompson sifted through, approving some and rejecting others. That was 1987. This year it was time to begin the refinements. The most controversial AIDS bills this year were H.B. 4005 (P.A. 85-1399), which Thompson signed, and H.B. 3695, which he vetoed. H.B. 4005 contains three major provisions:
The final controversial provision was pushed by the Illinois Medical Society and added in a conference committee report on June 29. Dr. Bernard Turnock, Thompson's director of the Department of Public Health, urged its veto. The governor acknowledged the controversy and attached a message to the bill when he signed it. "H.B. 4005, like the bills I acted on last September, requires that the state exercise its responsibility to weigh individual rights against the public safety, protecting the health of the community at large," Thompson argued. And Thompson stressed that the confidentiality provisions of last year's measures remain intact and protect patients. The flap produced some dissension in the medical community. Dr. Richard J. Sassetti resigned from chairmanship of the Illinois Medical Society's Ad Hoc Committee on AIDS because of the lack of input from the committee and the lateness of the hour. The other bill would have allowed dentists to refuse to treat persons with infectious diseases and instead refer them to another dentist who could treat them within 10 working days. Thompson said the legislation violated the state's Human Rights Act, that dentists were taking precautions and that 10 days with a tooth ache was too long. Less controversial than AIDS was fine-tuning done to the system that Illinois uses to pay refunds to taxpayers who have overpaid their income tax. Currently the General Assembly pays those refunds by appropriation. And if, as was the case earlier this year, too little money is appropriated, taxpayers can wait and wait for refunds. A pair of identical bills H.B. 2918 and S.B. 1562, both amendatorily vetoed by the governor to delay the effective date by one year until January 1, 1990 would create an Income Tax Refund Fund and prevent the state from spending money that belongs to taxpayers. Initially 6 percent of individual income tax receipts and 18 percent of corporate receipts would be diverted to the refund fund. Later diversions would depend on balances and estimates of obligations. The money would be set aside and used to pay the refunds and would not be available for other use, as it is now. The legislation would eliminate, or at least make it harder, for the state to use money owed taxpayers for its own operations. The year's delay was necessary, Thompson said, to protect cash flow. "Since the legislature was unable to pass a modest increase in the state income tax, I must take action to protect our fiscal flexibility," he wrote in both veto messages. Other fine-tuning enacted by the General Assembly provides for:
October 1988 | Illinois Issues | 24 |
|