Home | Search | Browse | About IPO | Staff | Links |
A Note From The Editor Assessment Challenges Cooperation between units of local government is increasingly recognized as a necessary tool in effective administration of local government. This is particularly true in Illinois, which has the highest number of local governmental jurisdictions in the nation. No single problem holds the potential to unify the diverse interests of the many kinds of Illinois local governments—from park districts to county boards—as surely and decisively as limitations or threats to property tax revenue. After all, property taxes are a major source of revenue for all Illinois units of local government. Although park and forest preserve districts derive a major portion of their revenue from this source, their share of property taxes is low. In fact, as IAPD Executive Director Ted Flickinger notes in his article, which begins on page 6, "property tax expenditure on park districts represent an average of only 5% of local property taxes." Nevertheless, local park and recreation government units must be prepared to cooperate with other local taxing bodies whenever major threats are posed to their common property tax revenue base. Take for example the threat from a recent wave of tax objections organized and filed at the county level by firms outside the affected taxing districts. This trend has marshaled growing unity and awareness among local governments. It typically involves assessment firms approaching large businesses such as grain elevators or nursing homes, offering expertise, under contract, to help reduce the local firm's property tax assessment. Usually these outside assessment firms seek a percentage of tax savings, if any. The main concern is that the trend may widen to include any business that pays a substantial amount in property taxes. Taxing bodies in Logan and Menard Counties met recently with local grain elevator operators to discuss this phenomenon. The meeting included governing board members from a wide array of jurisdictions. The purpose was to discuss two new property tax objections filed in the county as a result of reassessment contracts with outside firms. "Even if you have a fair assessment, you can't get out of the contract," said one local official after the meeting. "We wanted to warn the public about the future threat such contracts pose." Such informational meetings are one good way to head off trouble whenever threats arise to endanger the local tax base.
|
|